Jefferson Davis on the Constitution

Jefferson Davis on the Constitution

An Extract from The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government

This selection is one of the best expositions of the compact theory of the constitution, by the man who served as president of the C.S.A. It comprises pages 75-168 of Volume I of The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government by Jefferson Davis, published in 1881.

Click Here to Download Jefferson Davis On the Constitution in PDF Form.

The new foreword by Daniel V. Bowden:

After the close of the War for Southern Independence, a number of Confederate generals and politicians turned to writing their memoirs, determined that the history of the conflict would not be entirely written by the victorious North. None was more determined than Jefferson Davis. Davis was not one to accept defeat easily. After the fall of Richmond he was forced to flee south with the records and papers of the Confederate government loaded in train cars and wagons. Making his way through South Carolina and Georgia, his entourage dwindled as the collapse of the Confederate military became apparent. Even after Lee’s surrender in Virginia, Davis hoped to travel west to Texas and continue the fight with Gen. Kirby Smith’s forces. After being informed by Gen. Joseph Johnston that his forces could no longer stand against Sherman’s army, Davis ordered Johnston to take his men into the hills and fight a guerilla war–Johnston ignored the order and surrendered instead. Davis managed to elude the Federal forces searching for him for some time, but his progress westward was hampered by his family, which was travelling with him. He was captured unharmed in south-central Georgia by Federal troops, but would have resisted had his wife not restrained him, fearing for his safety. The Confederate President spent two long years in Fort Monroe in Virginia as a federal prisoner, awaiting trial for treason.

After the war ended, and with the civil courts in full operation, the Republicans could no longer make a case for the use of military tribunals. Some of the best lawyers of the day volunteered to represent Davis. Faced with the prospect of having to try Davis before a jury of Virginians, the government dropped all charges and released him rather than risk an acquittal. A “not-guilty” verdict by a jury is unreviewable by any court, and such an acquittal would have been viewed–and rightly so–as a vindication of the South and an acknowledgment of the constitutionality of secession. The government had much to lose and little to gain by allowing such a trial, for which Davis was eager.

Davis retired to Beauvoir, his post-bellum home in Biloxi, Mississippi, and turned out his two-volume The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government, published in 1881. Buried within Volume I of this 1200+ page work is a short section entitled simply “The Constitution.” It is Davis’s explanation and exposition of the compact theory of the Constitution, the view which was almost universally-held by Southern statesmen, and, as Davis shows, by the founders themselves. Davis’ short work is one of the best written on the subject. He painstakingly and with great detail examines and refutes every argument that the United States as a nation-state preceded or was superior to the individual states, that the states gave up their sovereignty upon forming the Union, and that secession was illegal or unconstitutional. It is Davis’s brief for the defence, the one he never got a chance to present at trial.

Click Here to Read More


About partisanrangershow

Freedom fighter
This entry was posted in Important Historical Events/Suppressed History. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Jefferson Davis on the Constitution

  1. gideon says:

    The people delegate, not transfer their sovereignty. Love that. If there is one principle that pervades the Constitution, ….. in the whole theory of American Republicanism, it is that no government is sovereign. pgs. 58&59

    • Exactly. Davis very eloquently espoused the beliefs of the founders. Governments are not sovereign, they simply hold in trust the sovereignty of the people who loan some of their sovereignty to it for their mutual protection.

  2. gideon says:

    Yes Sir, I went back and reread, and do from time to time, the discussion we had at: That has really served to cement that concept for me.(again Thank you) He brings up another very interesting point, not the only one, about amendments. I was thinking how all the discussion about certain amendments being questionable from a ratification process view but never read or even heard of the what he talks about here. They can only amend existing delegated grants. They cannot delegate new grants. Makes perfect sense, just never heard that or read it before. Yes brother this is a really good piece.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s